“She’s too small to be plus sized.”
I’ve read that response quite often whenever a designer or a magazine features a plus size model. Granted, some of these models are 5’10 and wear a size 12, which in the “real world,” would be considered “straight size.”
However, I just stumbled across a tweet from The Curvy Fashionista (@MarieDenee), where she posts a link from retailer Addition Elle, which asks,
Addition Elle’s philosophy on the issue hits the nail on the head for me:
“Plus size” includes a range of shapes and sizes. Some women are short, some are tall, some have wide hips, some have straight hips, some have larger busts, some have smaller busts…but regardless of their features, they have one thing in common.
What is it? Well, that clothing in “traditional” sizes does not fit them, for whatever reason.”
Case in point: I have the WORST time buying shorts. They are usually too tight in the hip, or too loose in the waist. For some reason, I’m in a “no woman’s land” as a size 14. I don’t want booty shorts or Daisy Dukes. I guess designers must think I want elasticized, pull on polyester shorts (BLEAH!). Apparently, a mid thigh, stylish denim pair in my size is just not possible.
Then I wonder:
But what about a woman who is a size medium on top (say, an 8 or 10), and is pear shaped (a size 12 or 14) on the bottom? Or someone who is a 12 on the bottom, and wears a 38 DD on top? According to the size charts, she’d be “plus size.”
It’s all a bit nuts.
Men’s fashion is not complex. Pants are the waist size, shirts are the chest/neck measurement. If a guy is larger, he goes to the Big and Tall department.
Why can’t women’s fashion convert to such a system?
By the way, after a lot of searching, I DID finally find a pair of denim shorts! I found these from DEB.
Stylish, comfy, and fit great!
DEB Shops, you get the gold star.
I’d love to read your thoughts on what “plus size” is, or anything on your mind!
Love, laughter, and shoes!